The US Supreme Court

Post Reply
User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41341
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: The US Supreme Court

Post by Svartalf » Thu Oct 23, 2025 6:24 am

Sean Hayden wrote:
Wed Oct 22, 2025 11:31 pm
The Supreme Court can kiss my ass, they have authority by force alone, the worst kind of authority—bleh.
meaning that if it should come to that, it's much more likely they'll make you kiss THEIR bum rather than brownnose to you.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41341
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: The US Supreme Court

Post by Svartalf » Thu Oct 23, 2025 6:27 am

it's not so much he's married to a man than his love of stuffing it to people up where the sun doesn't shine.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Sean Hayden
Microagressor
Posts: 19265
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:55 pm
About me: feeling preachy
Contact:

Re: The US Supreme Court

Post by Sean Hayden » Mon Jan 05, 2026 2:43 pm

Supreme Court Increasingly Favors the Rich, Economists Say

A new study found that the court’s Republican appointees voted for the wealthier side in cases 70 percent of the time in 2022, up from 45 percent in 1953.
Supreme Court justices take two oaths. The first, required of all federal officials, is a promise to support the Constitution. The second, a judicial oath, is more specific. It requires them, among other things, to “do equal right to the poor and to the rich.”

A new study being released on Monday from economists at Yale and Columbia contends that the Supreme Court has in recent decades fallen short of that vow.

The study, called “Ruling for the Rich,” concludes that the wealthy have the wind at their backs before the justices and that a good way to guess the outcome of a case is to follow the money.

The study adds to what Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in a dissent in June, called “the unfortunate perception that moneyed interests enjoy an easier road to relief in this court than ordinary citizens.”
…continued https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/05/us/p ... -poor.html
We want to support our allies in preserving the freedom and security of Europe, while restoring Europe’s civilizational self-confidence and Western identity.

U.S. White House. (2025) National Security Strategy of the United States of America. ( link )

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 40519
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: The US Supreme Court

Post by Brian Peacock » Mon Jan 05, 2026 11:00 pm

Ah, but you have to factor in that richer people are just better, and moreso.
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests