The Thread of Democrats

[Cunt]

[Tero]

Dominus vo-bisque'em Et cum spear a tu-tu, oh!

[Cunt]

Are the Clintons still considered Democrats?

Or did their performance get them expunged from the party?

[Sean Hayden]

I was a teenager when that guy was president:

—was the meme at the time

[Cunt]

The trips to Little St. James Island were so innocent back then...

[Cunt]

Looks like Jamaal is getting busted for his insurrecting.

(he's the idiot who pulled a fire alarm, then tried to say he didn't know how to open a door and got confused)

I wonder if they'll 'January 6th' him, or if he'll get the 'Democrat-Friendly' treatment.

[rasetsu]

A judge on Wednesday tossed out the results of a Democratic mayoral primary in Connecticut’s largest city and ordered that a new one be held, citing surveillance videos showing people stuffing multiple absentee ballots into outdoor collection boxes.

The ruling came just six days before the general election, creating a perplexing scenario in which voters will decide the outcome of Bridgeport’s mayoral election on Nov. 7, then be asked to return to the polls at a later, undetermined date to choose the rightful Democratic nominee in that very same race.

In his ruling Wednesday, Superior Court Judge William Clark addressed the incongruity by saying he lacked the authority to postpone or cancel the general election. However, he said he had seen enough evidence of malfeasance to order a rerun of a Sept. 12 primary in which incumbent Mayor Joe Ganim defeated challenger John Gomes by 251 votes out of 8,173 cast.

“The volume of ballots so mishandled is such that it calls the result of the primary election into serious doubt and leaves the court unable to determine the legitimate result of the primary,” Clark wrote in his ruling.

The judge cited statistics showing that abnormally large numbers of absentee ballots were cast in certain voting districts and video evidence showing multiple people shoving stacks of ballots into drop boxes, in violation of state law.

“The videos are shocking to the court and should be shocking to all the parties,” Clark wrote.

https://apnews.com/article/connecticut- ... fdaa0b6369

[Cunt]

Reminds me of a movie 2000 mules...

Of course, that one was made by someone convicted of trying to mis-donate almost FIVE FIGURES to a failed candidate (of the wrong team)

[rasetsu]

[L'Emmerdeur]

2000 Mules is pathetic propaganda, presenting no verifiable evidence of voting fraud. It's a mess of JAQing, speculation, and outright falsehood. I doubt the 'leftie' from the north has even watched it. Here's an examination of its claims and its supposed evidence for him to ignore and sneer at. Nasty, nasty fact checkers!!!

'Does "2000 Mules" provide evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. presidential election?'

[Cunt]

lol

I already know the establishment line, but thanks for the chorus.

(holding back from making a lemming joke...)

[Joe]

lol

I already know the establishment line, but thanks for the chorus.

(holding back from making a lemming joke...)

What's the establishment line?

[rasetsu]

I'm still trying to figure out what the establishment is. Cunt doesn't appear to know.

[Cunt]

lol

I already know the establishment line, but thanks for the chorus.

(holding back from making a lemming joke...)

What's the establishment line?

On the 2020 election?

That it was obviously fair, safe and secure. Even if many private companies exercised censorship against those expressing a different opinion.

[rasetsu]

Cunt has a point. Anyone who's everyone knows that if it's from the establishment, it can't be true.

No need to even examine the claims and the evidence.