No. Just keep your bible for that.Geoff wrote:Could we keep all the biblical pr0n in?
I want you to write the 'marriage' guidelines.
No. Just keep your bible for that.Geoff wrote:Could we keep all the biblical pr0n in?
There is every point. St Paul and Mohamed knew the political power of codifying memes. There is no 'woo free' book of this type. Philosophers will contest everything it's in their nature so it's a given. There are no morally correct absolutes, that why I said 80% of the population not 'everybody'. This isn't a holy book, it's hopefully the best use of what humans have come up with so far to inform our descendents on how we saw the world progressing.lordpasternack wrote:There's no point - you'll have the philosopher's nit-picking every statement contesting its validity.Also, with morals, there are no real defininitive "right" answers - so you can't create a nice neat code for that.
By all means, create a book with parables and well-meaning attempts to understand ourselves, and our world and universe - but if there's anything that religion and its holy books ought to have taught us by now it's that we can never dish out something and say that it's now all there is to believe in.
32 pages maximum. This isn't a polemic on how wonderful we are, this is going to be a synthesis of all the best stuff in human history that has generally made things better not worse. Simple, short, accessible, guidebook to living what most people would consider a good life if they had to live it. We can't party on this world anymore, humanity has to grow up and put away it's childhood toys like the 'great sky daddy'.Feck wrote:Would it be too cynical to say that a book of Human wisdom would a very short book indeed ?
Any sexual acts that any number of consenting adults do in private are no-one's business but their own.CJ wrote:No. Just keep your bible for that.Geoff wrote:Could we keep all the biblical pr0n in?
I want you to write the 'marriage' guidelines.
"...anyone who says it’s “just the Internet” can. And then when they come back, they can
again." - Tigger
The Wisdom of our Species
Introduction
The Wisdom of our Species
We, the people of this world, are good people.
We are the keepers of this world.
We help those in need.
We do no harm.
Choice
We have free will, we can choose what we do. Every choice has effects on ourselves, those around us and on this world. We are responsible for those effects. Choose carefully and try to choose the path of least harm and most good.
Our World
This world is our home. There is no other place for us to live.
Life
Your life is your own, to do with as you see fit, including the time and manner of its ending where these are under your control.
Responsibility
You are responsible for the effects of your actions and must face the consequences of those actions that do material harm to others, be it their body or possessions.
Responsibility
We as self aware organisms have a responsibility to other members of our species and the world we live in to ensure they come to no undue harm through neglect, prejudice or the due to attainment of selfish aims. This encompasses all the aspects of humanitarianism, environmentalism and compassion.
Resources
Use only the minimum or resources that are necessary for the health and welfare of you and your family.
Knowledge
Do least harm while seeking knowledge.
Knowledge itself is never dangerous or wrong.
The application of knowledge must do no deliberate harm.
Reproduction
There is no obligation to reproduce.
Replace only yourself and your partner.
I don't like the idea of issuing instructions as opposed to guidance. I know the spirit of the sentence isn't a command, but it is syntacticly a command. I dunno...CJ wrote:The Wisdom of our Species
[...]
Replace only yourself and your partner.
Quite right. Instructions are not a good idea. However if humanity can't do this the world is fucked, it'll just be a matter of time till it happens but even if the replacement rate is 2.00000000000000001 with the size of the current population growth will be exponential at some point. For sustainability to be a practical the population must decrease at some points.lordpasternack wrote:I don't like the idea of issuing instructions as opposed to guidance. I know the spirit of the sentence isn't a command, but it is syntacticly a command. I dunno...CJ wrote:The Wisdom of our Species
[...]
Replace only yourself and your partner.
Yes, and I agree.CJ wrote: Quite right. Instructions are not a good idea. However if humanity can't do this the world is fucked, it'll just be a matter of time till it happens but even if the replacement rate is 2.00000000000000001 with the size of the current population growth will be exponential at some point. For sustainability to be a practical the population must decrease at some points.
Simply point out what you have above, and suggest that responsible reproduction is the best idea - perhaps suggesting only having one or two sprogs. Also worth noting, though, is that the population in most developed countries are already either stable or declining. There has already been a general cultural shift away from seeing having a brood of kids as being a success in life. Also - people used to have lots of kids just going by the knowledge that a few of them would die in infancy. That doesn't happen anymore in developed nations.How would you phrase it.?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests