Deliberate twisting of what was said seems to be the M.O. at work here.Kristie wrote: I'm pretty sure you are twisting words or misunderstanding his post.

Deliberate twisting of what was said seems to be the M.O. at work here.Kristie wrote: I'm pretty sure you are twisting words or misunderstanding his post.
Why? Explain what the problem is - that's what a discussion is for. It's not to preach at people. Also, how about linking to the comment - I've only been on three threads but have no idea what you refer to. Evidence matters. So, please provide it - it'll be a start.pzmyers wrote:I really, really recommend that you read Audley Strange's comment carefully. My summary was dead on. He literally said that tasteless, offensive jokes that attack a group aren't the problem, but that criticizing the people who say misogynistic jokes is "Bundy level of misogyny".
If you can't see the problem with that, you're more hopeless than I thought.
Seems he's more interested in talking AT us than TO us. Surprise surprise. "Free thought" at its finest.Badger3k wrote:Why? Explain what the problem is - that's what a discussion is for. It's not to preach at people. Also, how about linking to the comment - I've only been on three threads but have no idea what you refer to. Evidence matters. So, please provide it - it'll be a start.pzmyers wrote:I really, really recommend that you read Audley Strange's comment carefully. My summary was dead on. He literally said that tasteless, offensive jokes that attack a group aren't the problem, but that criticizing the people who say misogynistic jokes is "Bundy level of misogyny".
If you can't see the problem with that, you're more hopeless than I thought.
As am I. My request carries no official weight. PZ is also free to say all kinds of things about this forum on his site as long as it doesn't break any laws or the rules of where he posts them. Is that the standard?Pappa wrote:I'm free to criticise whoever I like if I do it without breaking the rules.Robert_S wrote:Pappa, STFU!Pappa wrote:I wish you could see your grandiose self-importance from the outside. Your proclamations are like fatwas and your opinions about the rationalist/atheist community are embarrassing.pzmyers wrote:A nest of cockroaches isn't filthy and unhygienic. Turning on the light and exposing a nest of cockroaches...now that's evil and disgusting.
There, see. I said the same thing you did, only with more brevity and panache.
You fucking knew, or should have known better than to make that thread. Even thought the OP came from FTB, it is a thread on our forum calling a person a racist.
You are calling out someone on their tone in a thread calling them a racist!!!
FOR FUCK'S SAKE STOP DIGGING!!!
I don't recall you posting very heavily in CES's threads on the Skepchics. You fucking trolled a group of people and now want to complain about the tone their friends take. You knew damn well that was provocative and would get a reaction.
Wumbologist wrote:Seems he's more interested in talking AT us than TO us. Surprise surprise. "Free thought" at its finest.Badger3k wrote:Why? Explain what the problem is - that's what a discussion is for. It's not to preach at people. Also, how about linking to the comment - I've only been on three threads but have no idea what you refer to. Evidence matters. So, please provide it - it'll be a start.pzmyers wrote:I really, really recommend that you read Audley Strange's comment carefully. My summary was dead on. He literally said that tasteless, offensive jokes that attack a group aren't the problem, but that criticizing the people who say misogynistic jokes is "Bundy level of misogyny".
If you can't see the problem with that, you're more hopeless than I thought.
I don't follow.Robert_S wrote:
You should have said "Seems you're more interested in talking AT us than TO us."
No just very very drunk.Drewish wrote:Where's the racist part? Am I just confused?!
Yes.Drewish wrote:Where's the racist part? Am I just confused?!
Talk TO him next time. He might respond.Wumbologist wrote:I don't follow.Robert_S wrote:
You should have said "Seems you're more interested in talking AT us than TO us."
You shut up... you... person!Twoflower wrote:No just very very drunk.Drewish wrote:Where's the racist part? Am I just confused?!
Drewish wrote:You shut up... you... person!Twoflower wrote:No just very very drunk.Drewish wrote:Where's the racist part? Am I just confused?!
Hi, PZ. I haven't followed this whole drama, so can't really comment one way or another. It's nice to see you here, though, and I appreciate you giving your two cents in person.pzmyers wrote:I really, really recommend that you read Audley Strange's comment carefully. My summary was dead on. He literally said that tasteless, offensive jokes that attack a group aren't the problem, but that criticizing the people who say misogynistic jokes is "Bundy level of misogyny".
If you can't see the problem with that, you're more hopeless than I thought.
tattuchu wrote:Hi, PZ. I haven't followed this whole drama, so can't really comment one way or another. It's nice to see you here, though, and I appreciate you giving your two cents in person.pzmyers wrote:I really, really recommend that you read Audley Strange's comment carefully. My summary was dead on. He literally said that tasteless, offensive jokes that attack a group aren't the problem, but that criticizing the people who say misogynistic jokes is "Bundy level of misogyny".
If you can't see the problem with that, you're more hopeless than I thought.
So how's it hanging? Little to the right here, myself.
What?Kristie wrote:tattuchu wrote:Hi, PZ. I haven't followed this whole drama, so can't really comment one way or another. It's nice to see you here, though, and I appreciate you giving your two cents in person.pzmyers wrote:I really, really recommend that you read Audley Strange's comment carefully. My summary was dead on. He literally said that tasteless, offensive jokes that attack a group aren't the problem, but that criticizing the people who say misogynistic jokes is "Bundy level of misogyny".
If you can't see the problem with that, you're more hopeless than I thought.
So how's it hanging? Little to the right here, myself.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests