DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Locked
surreptitious57
Posts: 1057
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:07 am

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by surreptitious57 » Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:27 pm

The way things are going there will soon be more ex members of Rat Skep over here than
members over there. So this must be an intricate plot on the part of Rationalia to boost its
numbers without anyone suspecting anything. But why not save time and just merge the two
sites since that would then help everyone to move forward in the spirit of mutual cooperation
A MIND IS LIKE A PARACHUTE : IT DOES NOT WORK UNLESS IT IS OPEN

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Gallstones » Mon Jun 09, 2014 5:26 pm

surreptitious57 wrote:
Hermit wrote:
Robert_S wrote:
I dare one of them to start a thread complaining about Rationalia
Is not that explicitly prohibited by their FUA
Last time I checked you were a member there which means you agreed to the FUA when you joined
Saying it is theirs implies that you have nothing to do with it and though you may not have a high post
count that is neither here nor there. Starting a thread about Rationalia would be a waste of time because
there is less enforcement of the rules by comparison [ in fact next to none ] so there would be no reason to
do so. Being a mod here must be the most boring job of all since no one really steps out of line. In point of fact
if there were none here it would make no difference whatsoever to the level of debate. Which is ironic given that
many here are either suspended or banned members of Rat Skep so you would expect a need for greater moderation
Yet everyone here just gets on with it and does not get too het up about what others say about them which is a good thing

You presume much and apply it with a great deal of sanctimony.
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Gallstones » Mon Jun 09, 2014 5:33 pm

DaveDodo007 wrote:How is Mick a troll if he is a Christian and he believes Christian theology? Mick was on the receiving end of quite a lot of insults and he gets banned? Only our own Cali was prepared to expose his question begging, fallacy of composition etc, funny how so called rationalist and skeptics just resort to mocking and calling anybody who disagrees with then a troll. How many so called ex ratskep 'trolls' do we have here who are anything but trolls. It seems that not agreeing with the groupthink over there means you are now a troll.
Expecting "rationalist and skeptics" to somehow be different from other people is funny. You'll laugh, you'll cry then hopefully you get over it and stop expecting anything special out of them.
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Gallstones » Mon Jun 09, 2014 5:34 pm

surreptitious57 wrote:The way things are going there will soon be more ex members of Rat Skep over here than
members over there. So this must be an intricate plot on the part of Rationalia to boost its
numbers without anyone suspecting anything. But why not save time and just merge the two
sites since that would then help everyone to move forward in the spirit of mutual cooperation
Now ^^this^^ is funny.
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
tattuchu
a dickload of cocks
Posts: 21889
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:59 pm
About me: I'm having trouble with the trolley.
Location: Marmite-upon-Toast, Wankershire
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by tattuchu » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:02 pm

DaveDodo007 wrote:How is Mick a troll if he is a Christian and he believes Christian theology? Mick was on the receiving end of quite a lot of insults and he gets banned? Only our own Cali was prepared to expose his question begging, fallacy of composition etc, funny how so called rationalist and skeptics just resort to mocking and calling anybody who disagrees with then a troll. How many so called ex ratskep 'trolls' do we have here who are anything but trolls. It seems that not agreeing with the groupthink over there means you are now a troll.
Exactly the sort of thing a troll would say, troll :prof:
People think "queue" is just "q" followed by 4 silent letters.

But those letters are not silent.

They're just waiting their turn.

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Mon Jun 09, 2014 9:48 pm

tattuchu wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:How is Mick a troll if he is a Christian and he believes Christian theology? Mick was on the receiving end of quite a lot of insults and he gets banned? Only our own Cali was prepared to expose his question begging, fallacy of composition etc, funny how so called rationalist and skeptics just resort to mocking and calling anybody who disagrees with then a troll. How many so called ex ratskep 'trolls' do we have here who are anything but trolls. It seems that not agreeing with the groupthink over there means you are now a troll.
Exactly the sort of thing a troll would say, troll :prof:
Damn and I would have got away with it if it wasn't for you meddling kid(s).
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
tattuchu
a dickload of cocks
Posts: 21889
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:59 pm
About me: I'm having trouble with the trolley.
Location: Marmite-upon-Toast, Wankershire
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by tattuchu » Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:18 pm

DaveDodo007 wrote:
tattuchu wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:How is Mick a troll if he is a Christian and he believes Christian theology? Mick was on the receiving end of quite a lot of insults and he gets banned? Only our own Cali was prepared to expose his question begging, fallacy of composition etc, funny how so called rationalist and skeptics just resort to mocking and calling anybody who disagrees with then a troll. How many so called ex ratskep 'trolls' do we have here who are anything but trolls. It seems that not agreeing with the groupthink over there means you are now a troll.
Exactly the sort of thing a troll would say, troll :prof:
Damn and I would have got away with it if it wasn't for you meddling kid(s).
Lets keep my personal life out of it!
People think "queue" is just "q" followed by 4 silent letters.

But those letters are not silent.

They're just waiting their turn.

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Tue Jun 10, 2014 2:05 am

tattuchu wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:
tattuchu wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:How is Mick a troll if he is a Christian and he believes Christian theology? Mick was on the receiving end of quite a lot of insults and he gets banned? Only our own Cali was prepared to expose his question begging, fallacy of composition etc, funny how so called rationalist and skeptics just resort to mocking and calling anybody who disagrees with then a troll. How many so called ex ratskep 'trolls' do we have here who are anything but trolls. It seems that not agreeing with the groupthink over there means you are now a troll.
Exactly the sort of thing a troll would say, troll :prof:
Damn and I would have got away with it if it wasn't for you meddling kid(s).
Lets keep my personal life out of it!
:lol:
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
Lion IRC
Posts: 361
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:45 am
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Lion IRC » Tue Jun 10, 2014 2:55 am

I'm astonished that Mick lasted that long.

User avatar
Lion IRC
Posts: 361
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:45 am
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Lion IRC » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:06 am

Hackenslash Wrote :
"...it is my intention to continue to attack this waste of breath mercilessly until one or other of us is no longer a member. He doesn't belong on the same forum as people with brains, empathy and compassion, and it is my new mission to hound him until he leaves or I am banned."

How does that work if Mick wants to join here now?

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60709
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by pErvinalia » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:11 am

That's an interesting quote(mine). That would appear to be a clear statement of intention to troll someone. I don't know much about Mick, so I don't know whether technically he deserved to be trolled, but if the site still claims to be fair and objective (does it still claim that, or has it finally openly stated that it is now a subjective dictatorship?) then it shouldn't allow this sort of thing. But if Mick was a waste of electrons, then I would have a hard time getting too worked up about this.

Having said that, though, I think every case should progress through the usual warning/suspension system. Just outright banning people doesn't make a lot of sense given the rhetoric the site alleges to function by...
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
Lion IRC
Posts: 361
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:45 am
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Lion IRC » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:15 am

I wouldnt be the first time 'fundie baiter' said ...either he goes or I do.
And the ultimatum obviously worked.

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:54 am

Lion IRC wrote:Hackenslash Wrote :
"...it is my intention to continue to attack this waste of breath mercilessly until one or other of us is no longer a member. He doesn't belong on the same forum as people with brains, empathy and compassion, and it is my new mission to hound him until he leaves or I am banned."

How does that work if Mick wants to join here now?

Well Hackenslash is suspended now though I don't know how long it is, he give the impression that he was pro free speech so I don't know what that rant was about. He is a member here so he might like to whine about ratskep here for a bit.
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Seth » Tue Jun 10, 2014 4:07 am

surreptitious57 wrote:
Hermit wrote:
Robert_S wrote:
I dare one of them to start a thread complaining about Rationalia
Is not that explicitly prohibited by their FUA
Last time I checked you were a member there which means you agreed to the FUA when you joined
Yes, this is true. The problem is, you see, that they don't follow their own FUA in handing out permabans. They just make shit up as they go and after they have banned someone they forbid discussion or questioning of the mods decisions. So even if you stay within the confines of the FUA you can still get banned for holding an unpopular opinion firmly enough.

Buncha fucking Stalinesque Star-chamber fuckwits if you ask me...or even if you don't.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Seth » Tue Jun 10, 2014 4:09 am

rEvolutionist wrote:That's an interesting quote(mine). That would appear to be a clear statement of intention to troll someone.
You should learn to distinguish between "troll" and "attack." Just because you get mad and stamp your feet like a three year old doesn't mean your opponent is "trolling" you, it just means you're acting like a child.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests