Ghatanothoa wrote:Making any vote does. Making a well reasoned vote doesn'tFeck wrote:so making any vote just gets you fos'd by Ghat ? OkGhatanothoa wrote:You also look like you are after somewhere safe and quiet to leave your vote feck
Star Trek TNG
Moderator: Mafia Mods
- Gallstones
- Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
- Posts: 8888
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
- About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.
Re: Star Trek TNG MARK 2 - Day 1 (Deja Q)
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
Re: Star Trek TNG MARK 2 - Day 1 (Deja Q)
Uselesstwit wrote:I really like pressure votes in small quantities, but doing them to everyone, even the people that have been asleep the whole time the thread has been open really clutters things.
as I see it, if on day one the people that post get jumped on then nobody is going to post , so you just have a situation where day one is a Limbo. Scum know who they want to lynch and who they want to night kill,the rest of us are looking for information .




Give me the wine , I don't need the bread
- Uselesstwit
- Posts: 2290
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:32 am
- Contact:
Re: Star Trek TNG MARK 2 - Day 1 (Deja Q)
I totally agree with this, presure votes should be saved until at least the halfway point of round. Right now I'm getting the feeling that some of them are just bs votes meant to be changed later so scum don't violate oblivion's scum don't like to change votes rule.Feck wrote:Uselesstwit wrote:I really like pressure votes in small quantities, but doing them to everyone, even the people that have been asleep the whole time the thread has been open really clutters things.
as I see it, if on day one the people that post get jumped on then nobody is going to post , so you just have a situation where day one is a Limbo. Scum know who they want to lynch and who they want to night kill,the rest of us are looking for information .
irretating wrote:you're a genius, UT!
- Magicziggy
- Posts: 4847
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:56 am
- Contact:
Re: Star Trek TNG MARK 2 - Day 1 (Deja Q)
I would just like to acknowledge Mono's vote. I am truly honoured.
vote Morticia
I'd like to see her make an appearance. This gives her two votes and places a bit of pressure.
At the moment, no one seems prepared to second vote. Too many easy single vote dumps imo.
Ends up being no pressure at all.
vote ghat
vote Morticia
I'd like to see her make an appearance. This gives her two votes and places a bit of pressure.
At the moment, no one seems prepared to second vote. Too many easy single vote dumps imo.
Ends up being no pressure at all.
vote ghat
- normal
- !
- Posts: 9071
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 4:23 pm
- About me: meh
- Location: North, and then some
- Contact:
Re: Star Trek TNG MARK 2 - Day 1 (Deja Q)
Unvote

Let us think the unthinkable, let us do the undoable, let us prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all. -Douglas Adams
Re: Star Trek TNG MARK 2 - Day 1 (Deja Q)
OB, Are start and end times remaining as was?
Auspicious Curmudgeon
Re: Star Trek TNG MARK 2 - Day 1 (Deja Q)
Nevermind, I see you added it to the OPDennyB wrote:OB, Are start and end times remaining as was?
Auspicious Curmudgeon
- Magicziggy
- Posts: 4847
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:56 am
- Contact:
Re: Star Trek TNG MARK 2 - Day 1 (Deja Q)
It's not always possible to be around at certain times of day. I like to put a vote down on a player to ensure a response and it is understood there is no basis other than that. So be assured it will be changed unless there is good reason no to.Uselesstwit wrote:I totally agree with this, presure votes should be saved until at least the halfway point of round. Right now I'm getting the feeling that some of them are just bs votes meant to be changed later so scum don't violate oblivion's scum don't like to change votes rule.Feck wrote:Uselesstwit wrote:I really like pressure votes in small quantities, but doing them to everyone, even the people that have been asleep the whole time the thread has been open really clutters things.
as I see it, if on day one the people that post get jumped on then nobody is going to post , so you just have a situation where day one is a Limbo. Scum know who they want to lynch and who they want to night kill,the rest of us are looking for information .
Re: Star Trek TNG MARK 2 - Day 1 (Deja Q)
Ack. So I still think it's too early for a "lynch the quiet ones vote". I do apologize for the misquoting though.
Badass Elf
Re: Star Trek TNG MARK 2 - Day 1 (Deja Q)
I can't speak for all but my vote is to get some interaction..higgs2 wrote:Ack. So I still think it's too early for a "lynch the quiet ones vote". I do apologize for the misquoting though.
I agree that lynch the quiet ones should come later.
What say ye Gib?
I see you around.....
Auspicious Curmudgeon
Re: Star Trek TNG MARK 2 - Day 1 (Deja Q)
Also from what I have seen in the games I've been involved in is town speeks up first...and gets lynched.DennyB wrote:I can't speak for all but my vote is to get some interaction..higgs2 wrote:Ack. So I still think it's too early for a "lynch the quiet ones vote". I do apologize for the misquoting though.
I agree that lynch the quiet ones should come later.
What say ye Gib?
I see you around.....

Auspicious Curmudgeon
- normal
- !
- Posts: 9071
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 4:23 pm
- About me: meh
- Location: North, and then some
- Contact:
Re: Star Trek TNG MARK 2 - Day 1 (Deja Q)
It is good night now. See you in about 8-9 hours.
I see what higgs means with "it's too early for a lynch the quiet ones vote", but I still do it. Even if it seems a bit pointless you see that it generates conversation. So maybe it's not as pointless as first thought.
I see what higgs means with "it's too early for a lynch the quiet ones vote", but I still do it. Even if it seems a bit pointless you see that it generates conversation. So maybe it's not as pointless as first thought.

Let us think the unthinkable, let us do the undoable, let us prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all. -Douglas Adams
- Don't Panic
- Evil Admin
- Posts: 10653
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:19 am
- About me: 100% Pure Evil. (Not from Concentrate)
- Location: Luimneach, Eire
- Contact:
Re: Star Trek TNG MARK 2 - Day 1 (Deja Q)
I'm going to put a tentative vote on Gallstones for now.
I'll be back before nightfall though.
I'll be back before nightfall though.
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
The world is a thing of utter inordinate complexity and richness and strangeness that is absolutely awesome. I mean the idea that such complexity can arise not only out of such simplicity, but probably absolutely out of nothing, is the most fabulous extraordinary idea. And once you get some kind of inkling of how that might have happened, it's just wonderful. And . . . the opportunity to spend 70 or 80 years of your life in such a universe is time well spent as far as I am concerned.
D.N.A.
- Gallstones
- Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
- Posts: 8888
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
- About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.
Re: Star Trek TNG MARK 2 - Day 1 (Deja Q)
Don't Panic wrote:I'm going to put a tentative vote on Gallstones for now.
I'll be back before nightfall though.


But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests