I find it strange that you should ask the question.pawiz wrote:I mentioned the fucking flagellum but no one took me seriously. Do I have a credibility issue?Pappa wrote:No. I think Gould gave 2-3 examples, including the flagellum. He gives a clear account of the many things standing in the way of wheels evolving on the macro scale.AshtonBlack wrote:At the macro scale?Pappa wrote:It has several times. The main constrain is blood flow (or fluid transfer) to the moving part. In all cases where it has evolved, the scale was small enough that the fluid issue wasn't a problem.AshtonBlack wrote:Interesting question.
I can't think of a circumstance where it could evolve through natural selection, since it hasn't already.
Stephen J. Gould wrote a good essay on it from what I remember.
It's about 7 years since I read it though, so I don't remember the details.
Evolving the wheel
- Rum
- Absent Minded Processor
- Posts: 37285
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
- Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
- Contact:
Re: Evolving the wheel
- cowiz
- Shirley
- Posts: 16482
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:56 pm
- About me: Head up a camels arse
- Location: Colorado
- Contact:
Re: Evolving the wheel
Phew that's a relief, for a moment I thought I might have had one. Thanks for clarifyingRum wrote: I find it strange that you should ask the question.
It's a piece of piss to be cowiz, but it's not cowiz to be a piece of piss. Or something like that.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Evolving the wheel
E.E. "Doc" Smith described the Zabriskan Fotema. You may be able to Google that.Rum wrote:As I was walking the dogs this evening I found myself marvelling at their leg action and at how evolution had developed locomotion in this form. It got me wondering though.
Do you think that life (on earth) would be able to evolve the wheel as a form of locomotion?
-
PsychoSerenity
- "I" Self-Perceive Recursively
- Posts: 7824
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:57 am
- Contact:
Re: Evolving the wheel
How about not on earth? I would imagine it would be more likely on a planet with higher gravity - surfaces might be flatter, and lifting the body on legs would be less efficient. Perhaps some exoskeleton type creature could make the transition to the macro.Rum wrote:Do you think that life (on earth) would be able to evolve the wheel as a form of locomotion?
There might be alien crabs with wheels somewhere out there right now.
Watching us.
[Disclaimer - if this is comes across like I think I know what I'm talking about, I want to make it clear that I don't. I'm just trying to get my thoughts down]
- mistermack
- Posts: 15093
- Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
- About me: Never rong.
- Contact:
Re: Evolving the wheel
I don't think anything tiny and aquatic really qualifies as a wheel.
To me, a wheel is a thing that rolls along the ground, and carries a load through the axle. So for a true wheel to evolve, the axle or wheel bearing would need to evolve alongside it. And one wheel is pretty useless, you would need at least two, for balance. And what would drive the wheel? You would still need legs, for propulsion, because you couldn't attach muscles directly to the wheel, they would twist up, along with the blood supply.
So you would need something like a rickshaw, with legs for propulsion, and two wheels at the back to carry the load.
And the wheels would have to be seperate from the 'cart', as no blood vessels could go from one to the other.
It's a highly unlikely and unecessary setup.
it would stand more chance in a water creature, where the wheels could be seperate colonies, feeding independently, but there is no advantage of a wheel underwater, as load carrying isn't that important.
So it's no surprise it hasn't evolved in the true sense of a wheel.
.
To me, a wheel is a thing that rolls along the ground, and carries a load through the axle. So for a true wheel to evolve, the axle or wheel bearing would need to evolve alongside it. And one wheel is pretty useless, you would need at least two, for balance. And what would drive the wheel? You would still need legs, for propulsion, because you couldn't attach muscles directly to the wheel, they would twist up, along with the blood supply.
So you would need something like a rickshaw, with legs for propulsion, and two wheels at the back to carry the load.
And the wheels would have to be seperate from the 'cart', as no blood vessels could go from one to the other.
It's a highly unlikely and unecessary setup.
it would stand more chance in a water creature, where the wheels could be seperate colonies, feeding independently, but there is no advantage of a wheel underwater, as load carrying isn't that important.
So it's no surprise it hasn't evolved in the true sense of a wheel.
.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.
- Rum
- Absent Minded Processor
- Posts: 37285
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
- Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
- Contact:
Re: Evolving the wheel
You raise one intriguing possibility - a symbiotic relationship where the 'wheels' are a different organism, but ultimately both organisms require the other to survive. Best option yet I think, however unlikely.mistermack wrote:I don't think anything tiny and aquatic really qualifies as a wheel.
To me, a wheel is a thing that rolls along the ground, and carries a load through the axle. So for a true wheel to evolve, the axle or wheel bearing would need to evolve alongside it. And one wheel is pretty useless, you would need at least two, for balance. And what would drive the wheel? You would still need legs, for propulsion, because you couldn't attach muscles directly to the wheel, they would twist up, along with the blood supply.
So you would need something like a rickshaw, with legs for propulsion, and two wheels at the back to carry the load.
And the wheels would have to be seperate from the 'cart', as no blood vessels could go from one to the other.
It's a highly unlikely and unecessary setup.
it would stand more chance in a water creature, where the wheels could be seperate colonies, feeding independently, but there is no advantage of a wheel underwater, as load carrying isn't that important.
So it's no surprise it hasn't evolved in the true sense of a wheel.
.
Re: Evolving the wheel
lawl.
"It doesn't fit my definition of a wheel and is therefore not a wheel".
"It doesn't fit my definition of a wheel and is therefore not a wheel".
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."
- Pappa
- Non-Practicing Anarchist

- Posts: 56488
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
- About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
- Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
- Contact:
Re: Evolving the wheel
Even if it doesn't qualify as a wheel by a certain definition, it is still the vital precursor of a macro-wheel. Though, for various reasons macro-wheels are seen to be either impossible or so highly improbable they will never evolve, even in an environment in which they would be useful.mistermack wrote:I don't think anything tiny and aquatic really qualifies as a wheel.
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.
When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.
Re: Evolving the wheel
This is a sort of wheel, although it has no axle
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1RHmSm3 ... re=related[/youtube]
The problem is the axles. Muscles can't turn axles without a crank or ratchet mechanism, and lubrication and seals are a problem.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1RHmSm3 ... re=related[/youtube]
The problem is the axles. Muscles can't turn axles without a crank or ratchet mechanism, and lubrication and seals are a problem.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Evolving the wheel
So put the muscles on the rim of the wheel. (Think of an octopus-thingy that rolls.)GrahamH wrote:This is a sort of wheel, although it has no axle
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1RHmSm3 ... re=related[/youtube]
The problem is the axles. Muscles can't turn axles without a crank or ratchet mechanism, and lubrication and seals are a problem.
Re: Evolving the wheel
How about a spider (gravity power only, it seems).Gawdzilla wrote:So put the muscles on the rim of the wheel. (Think of an octopus-thingy that rolls.)
The Golden wheel spider
- Rum
- Absent Minded Processor
- Posts: 37285
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
- Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
- Contact:
Re: Evolving the wheel
Well I'll be damned. It isn't a million miles from this to some sort of 'wheel', and nature, as every, does the unpredictable.GrahamH wrote:How about a spider (gravity power only, it seems).Gawdzilla wrote:So put the muscles on the rim of the wheel. (Think of an octopus-thingy that rolls.)
The Golden wheel spider
- Thinking Aloud
- Page Bottomer
- Posts: 20111
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:56 am
- Contact:
Re: Evolving the wheel
The other possibility is that a creature develops the ability to secrete something wheel-like (as a by-product of other secretions no doubt at first) that it can then mount on its legs or elsewhere for motion...
http://thinking-aloud.co.uk/ Musical Me
Re: Evolving the wheel
There's no reason a creature can't evolve a wheel operating on an axis, we simply just can't picture how it would work.
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests