Another nuke test for little Kimmy?

Post Reply
User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Another nuke test for little Kimmy?

Post by FBM » Fri Jun 12, 2009 1:13 am

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090612/ap_ ... ea_nuclear

AP source: NKorea may be prepping new nuclear test

WASHINGTON – North Korea may be preparing for its third nuclear test, a show of defiance as the United Nations considers new sanctions on the dictatorship for conducting an underground nuclear explosion in May, according to a U.S. government official.

North Korea conducted an underground explosion on May 25, its first since a 2006 atomic test. The official, who spoke Thursday on condition of anonymity in order to discuss the unreleased information, would not provide details regarding the assessment.

A draft U.N. resolution proposed Wednesday would impose tough sanctions on North Korea's weapons exports and financial dealings and allow inspections of suspect cargo in ports and on the high seas. North Korea has threatened to retaliate if new sanctions are adopted.

North Korea already is a pariah to many countries and has been under tough economic sanctions for years. Last month's reported test defied a Security Council resolution adopted after the North's first underground atomic blast in October 2006.

The White House National Security Council would not comment on the assessment of a possible third nuclear test in the works.

"We have come to expect North Korea to act recklessly and dangerously," NSC spokesman Mike Hammer said in a statement. "But while the world unites to pass a strong new Security Council resolution, it is clear that North Korea's behavior is succeeding only in further isolating itself."

President Barack Obama's special envoy on North Korea, Stephen Bosworth, said Thursday that the United States is determined to make sure the North faces serious consequences for its growing missile and nuclear threat.

Bosworth told lawmakers at a hearing that the Obama administration is considering freezing North Korean accounts at banks outside the country. Similar action by the George W. Bush administration infuriated the North and effectively severed it from the international financial system and led to a breakdown in nuclear talks.

But Bosworth also said Obama wants to talk to Pyongyang, either through the six-nation mechanism or directly.

North Korea has so far spurned the administration's attempts at engagement, Bosworth said. The North will come back to disarmament talks eventually, he said, but not soon.

For now, Bosworth said, North Korea will "suffer consequences if it does not reverse course."

Also on Thursday, CIA Director Leon Panetta said U.S. intelligence agencies are watching North Korea very closely in hopes of detecting or preventing North Korea's sale of nuclear and missile expertise and technology "to anyone willing to pay."

North Korea is a hard target to spy on but "we are making good progress," Panetta said.

The administration's approach to confronting North Korea will be an "important signal" for how it will deal with Iran if it continues to pursue nuclear weapons, he said.

The United States accuses Iran of secretly trying to develop atomic weapons. Iran denies the allegation.

In Brussels, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said there are no indications North Korea is making preparations for a military strike.

Gates says the Pyongyang regime is unpredictable, however, so he does not dismiss the threats.

___

Associated Press writer Foster Klug contributed to this report.
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

User avatar
Transgirlofnofaith
Everyone's favourite loudmouth Furry narcissist.
Posts: 1319
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:09 am
Contact:

Re: Another nuke test for little Kimmy?

Post by Transgirlofnofaith » Fri Jun 12, 2009 1:44 am

Is it just another shitty little bomb? Or will this one go off properly? :think:
Under (re)construction

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Another nuke test for little Kimmy?

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Fri Jun 12, 2009 1:45 am

Manofnofaith wrote:Is it just another shitty little bomb? Or will this one go off properly? :think:
What do you bet they've used every bit of fissile material they could find just to pop one cap?
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: Another nuke test for little Kimmy?

Post by FBM » Fri Jun 12, 2009 1:53 am

Gawdzilla wrote:
Manofnofaith wrote:Is it just another shitty little bomb? Or will this one go off properly? :think:
What do you bet they've used every bit of fissile material they could find just to pop one cap?
It'd be nice if they used up all they had doing these tests, but intel reports strongly suggest otherwise. :nono:
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

User avatar
Transgirlofnofaith
Everyone's favourite loudmouth Furry narcissist.
Posts: 1319
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:09 am
Contact:

Re: Another nuke test for little Kimmy?

Post by Transgirlofnofaith » Fri Jun 12, 2009 2:07 am

FBM wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:
Manofnofaith wrote:Is it just another shitty little bomb? Or will this one go off properly? :think:
What do you bet they've used every bit of fissile material they could find just to pop one cap?
It'd be nice if they used up all they had doing these tests, but intel reports strongly suggest otherwise. :nono:
What I was trying to ask was, are they getting any better at building them? The first two were just detonated underground. Have they gotten near building something they could explode on the surface for the purpose of filming?
Under (re)construction

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: Another nuke test for little Kimmy?

Post by FBM » Fri Jun 12, 2009 2:40 am

Manofnofaith wrote:What I was trying to ask was, are they getting any better at building them? The first two were just detonated underground. Have they gotten near building something they could explode on the surface for the purpose of filming?
Hard to say. The second test was a lot better than the first, and they've been firing off ICBMs lately. It's just a matter of time before they downsize the test nuke to the point where it will fit on a warhead. I doubt they'd do an above-ground test at all. But then again... :dono:
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 12 guests