D-Day landings have failed.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: D-Day landings have failed.

Post by Coito ergo sum » Mon Jun 17, 2013 2:44 pm

Gawdzilla Sama wrote:
MiM wrote:Who is July, 5 :ask:
No clue. That missive was written before the attack, so Ike wouldn't have to compose something while dealing with an utter disaster. I therefore suspect they meant JUNE 5.
I vaguely recall something about Ike writing out a defeat-related note ahead of time. I think it was something to do with being easier to write ahead of time than it would be if the mission actually did go wrong.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: D-Day landings have failed.

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Mon Jun 17, 2013 3:31 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:
Gawdzilla Sama wrote:
MiM wrote:Who is July, 5 :ask:
No clue. That missive was written before the attack, so Ike wouldn't have to compose something while dealing with an utter disaster. I therefore suspect they meant JUNE 5.
I vaguely recall something about Ike writing out a defeat-related note ahead of time. I think it was something to do with being easier to write ahead of time than it would be if the mission actually did go wrong.
That's in the OP, CES. :lol:
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: D-Day landings have failed.

Post by Coito ergo sum » Mon Jun 17, 2013 3:38 pm

Gawdzilla Sama wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
Gawdzilla Sama wrote:
MiM wrote:Who is July, 5 :ask:
No clue. That missive was written before the attack, so Ike wouldn't have to compose something while dealing with an utter disaster. I therefore suspect they meant JUNE 5.
I vaguely recall something about Ike writing out a defeat-related note ahead of time. I think it was something to do with being easier to write ahead of time than it would be if the mission actually did go wrong.
That's in the OP, CES. :lol:
It isn't, actually. Your OP has the image with the quote, but it doesn't say when or why it was written. Or, am I missing it?

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: D-Day landings have failed.

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Mon Jun 17, 2013 3:42 pm

It was just the starter, CES. Sheesh.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: D-Day landings have failed.

Post by Coito ergo sum » Mon Jun 17, 2013 3:43 pm

Gawdzilla Sama wrote:It was just the starter, CES. Sheesh.
Isn't "OP" a reference to the first post in the thread?

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: D-Day landings have failed.

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Mon Jun 17, 2013 3:44 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:
Gawdzilla Sama wrote:It was just the starter, CES. Sheesh.
Isn't "OP" a reference to the first post in the thread?
Fuck it. Have fun.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
kiore
Posts: 182
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:24 am
Location: Horn of Africa
Contact:

Re: D-Day landings have failed.

Post by kiore » Mon Jun 17, 2013 3:53 pm

Eisenhower's note, I suppose he didn't trust himself to say this clearly should the landings have actually failed. Really the landings were a very successful surprise attack, note that Rommel had gone home for his wife's birthday, no way he would have gone if this was even slightly expected on these days.
Image
http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/ ... e&t=182116[/imgc]
Folding with:

Phenom II 955 2x GTX 560 ti.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: D-Day landings have failed.

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Mon Jun 17, 2013 3:54 pm

kiore wrote:Eisenhower's note, I suppose he didn't trust himself to say this clearly should the landings have actually failed. Really the landings were a very successful surprise attack, note that Rommel had gone home for his wife's birthday, no way he would have gone if this was even slightly expected on these days.
FUSAG had a great deal to do with that. Without the fake First US Army Group, and it's famous "commander", there would have been less confidence in Berlin that the Normandy landings were a feint.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Ian
Mr Incredible
Posts: 16975
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Washington DC

Re: D-Day landings have failed.

Post by Ian » Mon Jun 17, 2013 8:08 pm

Criticism without proposing a realistic alternative, or any alternative for that matter, is nothing more than a whine.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: D-Day landings have failed.

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Mon Jun 17, 2013 8:39 pm

Ian wrote:Criticism without proposing a realistic alternative, or any alternative for that matter, is nothing more than a whine.
And rather hard in this case as the proponent would have to come up with an viable "easier" alternative that SHAEF missed. That brain trust was very impressive.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
laklak
Posts: 21022
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm
About me: My preferred pronoun is "Massah"
Location: Tannhauser Gate
Contact:

Re: D-Day landings have failed.

Post by laklak » Mon Jun 17, 2013 9:05 pm

They should have taken off and nuked the whole site from orbit.
Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion, man.

User avatar
kiore
Posts: 182
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:24 am
Location: Horn of Africa
Contact:

Re: D-Day landings have failed.

Post by kiore » Mon Jun 17, 2013 9:30 pm

Gawdzilla Sama wrote:
kiore wrote:Eisenhower's note, I suppose he didn't trust himself to say this clearly should the landings have actually failed. Really the landings were a very successful surprise attack, note that Rommel had gone home for his wife's birthday, no way he would have gone if this was even slightly expected on these days.
FUSAG had a great deal to do with that. Without the fake First US Army Group, and it's famous "commander", there would have been less confidence in Berlin that the Normandy landings were a feint.
Yes the misinformation campaign also very effective, but perhaps most effective on the day rather than the misinformation which indicated that a second main invasion site near Calais was the main attack which successfully tied up significant defensive resources, was that the weather forecast indicated it was not a go for this time.. The battle of the weather forecasters.. As the weather seems to indicate the invasion would be not possible until the next tide cycle, the defenders felt they had a few weeks breathing space, when in fact a small window had opened.
Image
http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/ ... e&t=182116[/imgc]
Folding with:

Phenom II 955 2x GTX 560 ti.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: D-Day landings have failed.

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Mon Jun 17, 2013 9:36 pm

Well, I don't give SHAEF any credit for the weather fooling the Germans. :hehe: But I get your point. However, I still credit FUSAG with tying up vital troops, causing Normandy to be shorted with regard to supplies and fortification building, and for confusing the wenig Bayerischen Korporal when it came time to act.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
kiore
Posts: 182
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:24 am
Location: Horn of Africa
Contact:

Re: D-Day landings have failed.

Post by kiore » Mon Jun 17, 2013 10:01 pm

Gawdzilla Sama wrote:Well, I don't give SHAEF any credit for the weather fooling the Germans. :hehe: But I get your point. However, I still credit FUSAG with tying up vital troops, causing Normandy to be shorted with regard to supplies and fortification building, and for confusing the wenig Bayerischen Korporal when it came time to act.
Well the weather gave a window for the operation to be successful, the planning was indeed the key factor, casualties were really quite light considered those suffered in training and the projections.. Surprise was achieved despite the attack being expected.. This was really quite extraordinary, perhaps the major planning failure was in the follow through.. It is similarly extraordinary that the Bocage was not planned for or even understood, a major intelligence blunder that the photo reconnaissance cannot be be wholly blamed for, even the Romans had commented on it, so was hardly a new surprise factor..
Image
http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/ ... e&t=182116[/imgc]
Folding with:

Phenom II 955 2x GTX 560 ti.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: D-Day landings have failed.

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Mon Jun 17, 2013 10:41 pm

kiore wrote:
Gawdzilla Sama wrote:Well, I don't give SHAEF any credit for the weather fooling the Germans. :hehe: But I get your point. However, I still credit FUSAG with tying up vital troops, causing Normandy to be shorted with regard to supplies and fortification building, and for confusing the wenig Bayerischen Korporal when it came time to act.
Well the weather gave a window for the operation to be successful, the planning was indeed the key factor, casualties were really quite light considered those suffered in training and the projections.. Surprise was achieved despite the attack being expected.. This was really quite extraordinary, perhaps the major planning failure was in the follow through.. It is similarly extraordinary that the Bocage was not planned for or even understood, a major intelligence blunder that the photo reconnaissance cannot be be wholly blamed for, even the Romans had commented on it, so was hardly a new surprise factor..
And the Maquis had warned them about this unique terrain feature as well.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests