Aspire - your quote tags are fucked up. I'm not sure if your reply is from yourself or someone else. But it's bullshit either way.
aspire1670 wrote:Beatsong wrote:So I just went back to see whether Cito had actually said what you're ascribing to him, and saw where the whole to do with Metatron started. You wrote:
"Soundbites" to Metatron's disagreement? He appealed to chemophobia and "think of the children" emotional reasoning, and I responded with substantial rebuttals. When he had no other argument he relied on the idea that there is a conspiracy of clinicians drugging children to line their pockets - that is a conspiracy theory.
And then Metatron responded all prickly like, for the very understandable reason that he never actually said ANYTHING REMOTELY LIKE what you claimed he said. You basically just made it up.
And then despite seven more pages of him explaining what he DID actually think, and saying NOTHING of any such money making conspiracy, you come here with your sweet little innocent face all
"What? ME misrepresenting?" and just repeat the lie.
The Metatron made a whole series of posts that may be fairly interpreted as arguing some clinicians were drugging children for other than clinical reasons. He even wondered aloud what Mr Samsa stood to gain from supporting drug treatment for some children with ADHD. I found these posts by using the search terms "drugging children". If you can't find Metatron's explicit and implicit references to drugging for gain then you need to hone your search skills and pay more attention to reading for comprehension.
And you wonder why you're running out of friends there.
Nope.
All metatron said was that children were being drugged when they shouldn't be drugged. The ONLY place where he offered a reason why, was here:
It's becoming more and more obvious to me that the desire is to modify the behavior of the outliers to make them act more like the masses. Easier to handle, that way. Less work.
Which has absolutely nothing whatsofuckingever to do with it being a conspiracy to make money.
Furthermore, "Big Pharma" is not a reference to clinicians. It's a reference to drug COMPANIES. Mr Samsa's reference to the "conspiracy theory" aspect of it is indeed resonant of where the term originally comes from - from the idea that the drug COMPANIES are selling people drugs that they don't need or are bad for them, just to make money.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_pharma
Metatron by contrast never even made ANY reference to the drug companies. Nor did he make any suggest that the REASON for the (in his opinion) incorrect prescribing of drugs by clinicians could be traced back to such companies or their supposed "conspiracy". He did in fact give the reason why he thought they were making such incorrect prescriptions. Like I said the thread up to that point was only three pages long so it's not hard to find, and I've quoted it above. Samsa just chose to ignore it and put words in his mouth instead, that's all.
But hey, let's not take my word for it. If you're convinced that you've found so many examples of Metatron saying that BIG PHARMA (ie, the drug companies) are involved in a conspiracy to drug children TO MAKE MONEY, then it should be dead easy for you to link to them, right? So I extend exactly the same invitation to do so as I extended to Mr Samsa. And then if it's not entirely clear what he meant and it could be interpreted several ways, we can talk about that...
But we know neither you or Samsa are going to do that, because he didn't actually say ANYTHING that could POSSIBLY be interpreted that way. I'm not sure why I have to keep saying, and capitalising, this, if it is so obvious that he did. All you or Samsa have to do is provide the link/quote. So go on then...
