DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Locked
User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Jason » Fri May 16, 2014 11:14 pm

Svartalf wrote:
Făkünamę wrote:
Surendra Darathy wrote:Bend a spoon.
Do not try and bend the spoon. That's impossible. Instead... only try to realize the truth.
Bending a spoon is quite easy, with two hands, .
I know Kung Fu. :levi:

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Fri May 16, 2014 11:19 pm

Făkünamę wrote:He probably gets his delusions of intelligence from his work history as an engineer at NASA.
Lol, engineers (along with doctors) are the easiest STEM's to convince to be suicide bombers for the magic man in the sky. So it at least makes sense how he behaves.
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

Beatsong
Posts: 444
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 11:33 am
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Beatsong » Fri May 16, 2014 11:36 pm

DaveDodo007 wrote:Honest question: Are you defending The_matatron because you feel he is being misrepresented as I have no clue what this is about.
That wasn't particularly my intention. For a start there's nothing here to defend him against, and even if there were I'm sure he's perfectly capable of defending himself. I don't even particularly agree with his position in that thread vis a vis ADHD.

I was only pointing out that Mr Samsa was indeed misrepresenting him. Blatently and unquestionably so.

You say you have no clue what this is about but it's really very simple. Go look at Metatron's posts in that thread and try to find any that say anything about how "Big Pharma is drugging children to make money". Just look up to page three if you can't be bothered as that's where the accusation was first made.

It didn't happen. Samsa just made it up.

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Sat May 17, 2014 12:03 am

Beatsong wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:Honest question: Are you defending The_matatron because you feel he is being misrepresented as I have no clue what this is about.
That wasn't particularly my intention. For a start there's nothing here to defend him against, and even if there were I'm sure he's perfectly capable of defending himself. I don't even particularly agree with his position in that thread vis a vis ADHD.

I was only pointing out that Mr Samsa was indeed misrepresenting him. Blatently and unquestionably so.

You say you have no clue what this is about but it's really very simple. Go look at Metatron's posts in that thread and try to find any that say anything about how "Big Pharma is drugging children to make money". Just look up to page three if you can't be bothered as that's where the accusation was first made.

It didn't happen. Samsa just made it up.
The reason I mentioned it at all is there is some discussion in the manosphere about normal boys behaviour being considered 'bad' and ADHD which needs treatment with drugs, this would fit in with my worry about the feminist indoctrination of primary education, well fuck that as feminism and SJW (liberal progressives) influence on all education at every level of academia. If this is true then I might have to change my opinion of a Nazi mod at ratskep and that would never do. :sulk:
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60709
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by pErvinalia » Sat May 17, 2014 2:33 am

Beatsong wrote:
rEvolutionist wrote:why should someone get banned for misrepresentation??
Because it's against the FUA. "Banned" only subject to the process of escalation from warnings to suspensions to bannings of course.
What do you mean "of course"?? There was no process of escalation of regular infringements that would lead to banning. Unless that's changed since I was there.
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Seth » Sat May 17, 2014 3:52 am

Beatsong wrote:
Indeed. Thing is that "troll" is the single most woolly, undefined, make-of-it-what-you-will piece of stuff in the whole FUA. There's not even a pretence at trying to define what it actually means.
Too fucking right! It's a catch-all term used to dispense with anyone who annoys or displeases anyone with a Mod's ear in their pocket, and anyone who does not chant the Atheist religious mantra at all times.

One man's trolling is another man's deeply-held religious belief.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Warren Dew » Sat May 17, 2014 4:47 am

Beatsong wrote:You say you have no clue what this is about but it's really very simple. Go look at Metatron's posts in that thread and try to find any that say anything about how "Big Pharma is drugging children to make money". Just look up to page three if you can't be bothered as that's where the accusation was first made.
Finding the thread is a bigger hassle than finding the page. How about a link?

User avatar
Surendra Darathy
Posts: 701
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:45 pm
About me: I am only human. Keep in mind, I am Russian. And is no part of speech in Russian equivalent to definite article in English. Bad enough is no present tense of verb "to be".
Location: Rugburn-on-Knees, Kent, UK
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Surendra Darathy » Sat May 17, 2014 4:51 am

Beatsong wrote:Thing is that "troll" is the single most woolly, undefined, make-of-it-what-you-will piece of stuff in the whole FUA. There's not even a pretence at trying to define what it actually means.
You're thinking about it the wrong way, Beatsong. The best way to understand the definition of 'troll' at Ratskep is by induction from the list of members who've been banned as trolls. This approach does seem to go against the grain of people who prefer to have everything spelled out for them. One example of these are the people who wave around the Ten Commandments as a moral foundation. There's some more induction to be done with that. The proof is left as an exercise for the diligent student.
I'll get you, my pretty, and your little God, too!

User avatar
Scott1328
Posts: 1140
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Scott1328 » Sat May 17, 2014 4:52 am

Warren Dew wrote:
Beatsong wrote:You say you have no clue what this is about but it's really very simple. Go look at Metatron's posts in that thread and try to find any that say anything about how "Big Pharma is drugging children to make money". Just look up to page three if you can't be bothered as that's where the accusation was first made.
Finding the thread is a bigger hassle than finding the page. How about a link?
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/psych ... 44590.html

User avatar
Mr.Samsa
Posts: 713
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:06 am
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Mr.Samsa » Sat May 17, 2014 4:54 am

Scott1328 wrote:So, no perma ban for Samsa, just a month's long suspension for telling Weaver he was "cowardly hiding behind PM's" after Weaver had posted his rather hysterical and inflammatory rant.

Note, I believe, Samsa was making a reference to Weaver's faux pas last month, where he mistakenly posted on an open forum a PM he had intended to send to the moderators. This PM was blatantly abusive toward the Ex-mods who have lately been voicing criticism of current moderation.

It has happened on occasion that the mod team has granted leeway to those who retaliated against someone who first posted inflammatory content. Apparently not in this case however.
Like I said pages ago, there's no way they'll sanction Weaver and Theropod but not me. Instead of sanctioning infractions it seems to be a case of "scoring points" so if they have to concede a point then they'll want to score one by sanctioning me.

I guarantee you that if you search through ratskep, no one ever has or ever will again be sanctioned for referring to cowardly behavior.

User avatar
Surendra Darathy
Posts: 701
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:45 pm
About me: I am only human. Keep in mind, I am Russian. And is no part of speech in Russian equivalent to definite article in English. Bad enough is no present tense of verb "to be".
Location: Rugburn-on-Knees, Kent, UK
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Surendra Darathy » Sat May 17, 2014 4:59 am

Mr.Samsa wrote:Like I said pages ago, there's no way they'll sanction Weaver and Theropod but not me.
Aliens?
I'll get you, my pretty, and your little God, too!

User avatar
Mr.Samsa
Posts: 713
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:06 am
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Mr.Samsa » Sat May 17, 2014 5:02 am

Surendra Darathy wrote:
Mr.Samsa wrote:Like I said pages ago, there's no way they'll sanction Weaver and Theropod but not me.
Aliens?
That's your answer for everything isn't it?

User avatar
Surendra Darathy
Posts: 701
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:45 pm
About me: I am only human. Keep in mind, I am Russian. And is no part of speech in Russian equivalent to definite article in English. Bad enough is no present tense of verb "to be".
Location: Rugburn-on-Knees, Kent, UK
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Surendra Darathy » Sat May 17, 2014 5:23 am

Mr.Samsa wrote:I guarantee you that if you search through ratskep, no one ever has or ever will again be sanctioned for referring to cowardly behavior.
Perhaps that is so. Then again, they're not regarding your post about 'cowardly behaviour' in the context-free way you'd like. You just interpret your history differently to others. If I address a punk like Jayjay in the way I did, and it's not treated exactly the same as your addressing Metatron as 'cowardly', it's entirely due to RatSkep's moderation policy yielding any kind of informal meritocracy, however distracted it may temporarily be by an onslaught of whining. Executive summary is that your interpretation lacks merit where it counts. Whine about that.

That's my answer to everything you write.
I'll get you, my pretty, and your little God, too!

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Warren Dew » Sat May 17, 2014 5:23 am

Scott1328 wrote:
Warren Dew wrote:
Beatsong wrote:You say you have no clue what this is about but it's really very simple. Go look at Metatron's posts in that thread and try to find any that say anything about how "Big Pharma is drugging children to make money". Just look up to page three if you can't be bothered as that's where the accusation was first made.
Finding the thread is a bigger hassle than finding the page. How about a link?
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/psych ... 44590.html
Thanks. I got tired of Mr.Samsa's repetitive claptrap before I got to the part misrepresenting TheMetatron, but there were enough other misrepresentations in the parts that I did read for me to believe it's there. Looks like Mr.Samsa's status as former mod shielded him from the permaban, as expected, though.

Any scoop on what the policy change was that Weaver referred to in the other thread, that caused a mass moderator resignation?

User avatar
Surendra Darathy
Posts: 701
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:45 pm
About me: I am only human. Keep in mind, I am Russian. And is no part of speech in Russian equivalent to definite article in English. Bad enough is no present tense of verb "to be".
Location: Rugburn-on-Knees, Kent, UK
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Surendra Darathy » Sat May 17, 2014 5:35 am

Warren Dew wrote:Looks like Mr.Samsa's status as former mod shielded him from the permaban, as expected, though.
That just evokes more speculation about conspiracies. I see it rather differently. The long, slow process on Mr.Samsa at RatSkep looks like a fiendishly-clever and marvelously-disguised program of cognitive behavioural therapy, on which I'm now spilling the beans.

:dance: :funny: :tut: :naughty: :clap:
I'll get you, my pretty, and your little God, too!

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests