Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Post Reply
User avatar
Scott1328
Posts: 1140
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Scott1328 » Sun Aug 17, 2014 1:27 pm

How fuckwitted is arguing that 50% of the population be subjected to purity tests as the price for being granted equal rights?

What next Dave burkas for those evul wimmenz?

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41035
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Svartalf » Sun Aug 17, 2014 1:31 pm

define "purity test"?

and very fuckwitted if you're any kind of democrat... though the government of the corrupt at the behest of the morons they convince to vote for them gets tiresome...
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

Doubtdispelled
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:19 pm
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Doubtdispelled » Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:45 pm

DaveDodo007 wrote: I'll let you into a little secret, Just like the new atheist movement in the early days the manosphere has places were we discuss tactics. Just like the new atheists we have our own forums and know were to meet online. There we ask questions like 'have you heard this argument', 'were did the 1 in for 4 statistics come from as there is no link in this article.' 'Need a little help here (links to facebook/reddit/other/online discussion)', and my favourite 'use this if such and such an argument is posted.' How do you think MRAs can argue with ten different commentators at the same time in the comment sections? Are they all knowing and speed typists, yeah right! We are a small group who have each others backs and try to help each other in any way we can, there is no place for egotist as the cause is all. Probably my posts on why gender isn't a social construct are being used as I post this, I certainly hope so. :dance:
In other words: you have nothing whatsoever original to say.

I would never have guessed.
We used to laugh a lot
But only because we thought
That everything good always would remain
Nothing's gonna change there's no need to complain
- Jack Johnson.

User avatar
Fallible
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:59 pm
About me: pronoun; the objective case of I, used as a direct or indirect object.
Location: Scouseland
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Fallible » Tue Aug 19, 2014 11:39 am

DaveDodo007 wrote:Fuck me, there are some serious retards over at ratskep. They really need an IQ test before they allow people to join that forum, I have had harder challenges letting the cat chase the red dot.
I wouldn't shout too loudly about IQ tests being needed if I were you. :{D
Don't be afraid of what they'll say.
Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day.
- Yann Tiersen

Image

User avatar
rainbow
Posts: 13757
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
Where ever you are, Goethe was a Poet.
Location: Africa
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by rainbow » Tue Aug 19, 2014 12:10 pm

I call bullshit - Alfred E Einstein
BArF−4

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Robert_S » Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:36 pm

Dave got busted.

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/gener ... l#p2066124

What an idiot and a piss poor troll.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Strontium Dog
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:28 am
About me: Navy Seals are not seals
Location: Liverpool, UK
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Strontium Dog » Tue Aug 19, 2014 5:14 pm

To think that someone was sad enough to search every one of Dave's posts in order to bust him for plagiarism.

When they've got it in for you, they've got it in for you.

Speaking of which, it must be almost time for the warning I get every six months. You can time your watch by it.
100% verifiable facts or your money back. Anti-fascist. Enemy of woo - theistic or otherwise. Cloth is not an antiviral. Imagination and fantasy is no substitute for tangible reality. Wishing doesn't make it real.

"If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear" - George Orwell

"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!" - Barry Goldwater

User avatar
Scott1328
Posts: 1140
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Scott1328 » Tue Aug 19, 2014 5:25 pm

Strontium Dog wrote:To think that someone was sad enough to search every one of Dave's posts in order to bust him for plagiarism.

When they've got it in for you, they've got it in for you.

Speaking of which, it must be almost time for the warning I get every six months. You can time your watch by it.
Pro-tip: stop violating the FUA every six months and that won't happen.

User avatar
Strontium Dog
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:28 am
About me: Navy Seals are not seals
Location: Liverpool, UK
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Strontium Dog » Tue Aug 19, 2014 6:09 pm

You can't be so dumb as to believe that's what actually happens, surely.
100% verifiable facts or your money back. Anti-fascist. Enemy of woo - theistic or otherwise. Cloth is not an antiviral. Imagination and fantasy is no substitute for tangible reality. Wishing doesn't make it real.

"If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear" - George Orwell

"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!" - Barry Goldwater

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Robert_S » Tue Aug 19, 2014 6:23 pm

Strontium Dog wrote:To think that someone was sad enough to search every one of Dave's posts in order to bust him for plagiarism.

When they've got it in for you, they've got it in for you.

Speaking of which, it must be almost time for the warning I get every six months. You can time your watch by it.
He pretty much admitted it:

http://www.rationalia.com/forum/viewtop ... 0#p1575530

He's using these fora as a test market for his propaganda.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Robert_S » Tue Aug 19, 2014 6:27 pm

Strontium Dog wrote:You can't be so dumb as to believe that's what actually happens, surely.
I don't pay enough attention over there really, but I'd imagine that someone is on your side, timing the warnings so that you it doesn't look like you're getting away with everything yet you don't get banned either.

It must be nice to have friends in high places.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Robert_S » Tue Aug 19, 2014 6:30 pm

DaveDodo007 wrote:Fuck me, there are some serious retards over at ratskep. They really need an IQ test before they allow people to join that forum, I have had harder challenges letting the cat chase the red dot.
You and your silly little friends at the treehouse think tank with your talking points that, apparently, you are too lazy to even put in your own words. :biggrin:
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Scott1328
Posts: 1140
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Scott1328 » Tue Aug 19, 2014 7:10 pm

Strontium Dog wrote:You can't be so dumb as to believe that's what actually happens, surely.
Surely you can't be so narcissistic to think that you are being singled out.

You are just going to have to face up to your sociopathy and own it

User avatar
Strontium Dog
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:28 am
About me: Navy Seals are not seals
Location: Liverpool, UK
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Strontium Dog » Tue Aug 19, 2014 7:23 pm

Scott1328 wrote:
Strontium Dog wrote:You can't be so dumb as to believe that's what actually happens, surely.
Surely you can't be so narcissistic to think that you are being singled out.

You are just going to have to face up to your sociopathy and own it
Sociopathy! Look who's talking!

When you can demonstrate that the double standards which disproportionately disadvantage me are all accident or coincidence, then you can start throwing around accusations.
100% verifiable facts or your money back. Anti-fascist. Enemy of woo - theistic or otherwise. Cloth is not an antiviral. Imagination and fantasy is no substitute for tangible reality. Wishing doesn't make it real.

"If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear" - George Orwell

"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!" - Barry Goldwater

Doubtdispelled
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:19 pm
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Doubtdispelled » Tue Aug 19, 2014 7:56 pm

Scott1328 wrote:
Strontium Dog wrote:You can't be so dumb as to believe that's what actually happens, surely.
Surely you can't be so narcissistic to think that you are being singled out.

You are just going to have to face up to your sociopathy and own it
And the paranoia, Scott, you forgot that.

Only someone who is paranoid could possibly think that this
Strontium Dog wrote:To think that someone was sad enough to search every one of Dave's posts in order to bust him for plagiarism.
is what happened, when the real explanation is already there in black and white upthread.

:tea:
We used to laugh a lot
But only because we thought
That everything good always would remain
Nothing's gonna change there's no need to complain
- Jack Johnson.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 2 guests