Post
by L'Emmerdeur » Tue Mar 26, 2019 2:05 am
The Barr letter leaves a lot of questions unanswered. Its characterization of the relationship between the Trump campaign and the Russian election interference operation is very carefully worded, and to me it smells that the only substantive information we're given is a sentence fragment from Mueller's report. '(T)he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.' What preceded that fragment, and why did Barr decide not to include the entire sentence?
We know that most of the contacts between Russians and Trump associates and members of the Trump campaign (that they repeatedly and copiously lied about) were not with members of the Russian government, but with private citizens who had ties with the government. Trump sycophants have repeatedly pointed out that the IRA troll farm is not an official Russian government operation. It's run by a private citizen who is a close associate of Putin's. Oleg Deripaska, with whom Manafort had extensive dealings, is not part of the Russian government either, though he's another of Putin's henchmen. We could speculate about what precedes the sentence fragment, but we shouldn't have to.
Perhaps Barr is dismissing evidence that was found relating to this matter which doesn't rise to the level of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that a crime was committed. We simply don't know, and while I understand why Trump sycophants are cheering, and others breathing a sigh of relief that Trump's campaign wasn't engaged in shady dealings with Russians, it seems to me that they're being a bit premature.
In regard to obstruction of justice, Barr has stepped in to make a judgement where Mueller declined to. We already know that Barr's view of presidential powers and how they relate to the question of obstruction of justice is contrary to that of other legal scholars, and he has a history of shielding the executive branch from the consequences of highly dubious actions. He was brought in by Trump mostly on the basis of an unsolicited memo detailing his views on the matter, so it isn't surprising that he came down on it where he did. No doubt Trump and his supporters hope that Barr has said the last word on this issue, but there is little question that we will be hearing more about it.