When will the Biden impeachment start?

[rainbow]

Listened to Zeigler talking about his work with Marco Polo and bidencrimes.info

There is a bounty on substantial errors in his work, so if you guys know something he claimed that isn't factual, free money.

Or you could just claim it isn't worth trying. I, for one, have enough money.

Looks like there really hasn't been anything in the report that has been contested successfully. Might be worth noting which whorenalists, presstitutes and 'news agencies' went along with the cover up...

You are incredibly boring

[Cunt]

Listened to Zeigler talking about his work with Marco Polo and bidencrimes.info

There is a bounty on substantial errors in his work, so if you guys know something he claimed that isn't factual, free money.

Or you could just claim it isn't worth trying. I, for one, have enough money.

Looks like there really hasn't been anything in the report that has been contested successfully. Might be worth noting which whorenalists, presstitutes and 'news agencies' went along with the cover up...

You are incredibly boring

Aw, thanks. That's the nicest thing I ever remember you saying about the Biden crime family.

[rainbow]

Aw, thanks. That's the nicest thing I ever remember you saying about the Biden crime family.

Get over it

[Cunt]

If Biden wasn't really signing those documents, will someone else need to be impeached instead of him? Should anyone investigate why some group of people was 'pardoned' for activities dating back a decade?

[pErvinalia]

No one cares

[Cunt]

Oh look, libsoftiktok posted a Trump Truth post:


Of course, they didn't do anything wrong, so didn't need pardons (many dating back to 2014) anyway. No problem, right?

If only he hadn't been too mentally checked out, they could have tried him lol

[JimC]

I doubt whether a president can declare a previous president's pardons void. Much court activity to ensue...

[pErvinalia]

Courts are for girly men.

[Svartalf]

they are also for manly men after they do the manly thing and resolve their problems with a gun.

[Cunt]

I doubt whether a president can declare a previous president's pardons void. Much court activity to ensue...

I doubt that any 'anti-Trump' advocates will bother to wonder why a clump of those pardons date back to the revolution in Ukraine.

But they might still vigorously defend Biden's right to issue such pardons. Via autopen. When he wasn't even in the office.

[JimC]

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-03-18/ ... /105064992

Donald Trump claims Joe Biden's January 6 committee pardons are "void" because the former president signed them using an "autopen".

Presidents — including Trump — have used autopens for decades to sign documents and correspondence.

And one expert says that by raising the issue, Trump is only opening himself up for potential problems down the track.

An autopen is a device that mechanically replicates a person's signature.

A pen or other writing implement is gripped by the arm of a machine, which reproduces a signature after a writing sample has been "fed" to it.

It basically means prominent people — such as celebrities or politicians — can sign hundreds of documents each day without having to be directly involved, or even be in the same room.

Presidents have been using autopens for decades, according to Dr Melkonian.

"Donald Trump has admitted that he's using it," he said.

Can Trump void Biden's pardons?

No he can't, according to Dr Melkonian.

"He doesn't have that authority," he said.

"It would have to be the Supreme Court ... and I honestly do not think the court would try to go near it."

In fact, Dr Melkonian said most presidents avoided critiquing past presidents' pardons altogether.

"Because [they're] going to be doing the same thing," he said.

"I don’t know why Trump is doing this. All he’s setting himself up for is being questioned."

[Sean Hayden]

“He can’t do that!” —proceeds to do it, is getting a bit old

[JimC]

“He can’t do that!” —proceeds to do it, is getting a bit old

In terms of Biden's pardon's, he can "do it" in the sense of a declaration that they are void, but from all that I've read, it would be an empty statement in a legal sense - it would take some serious court procedures to even attempt it...

[Cunt]

ya, JimC, but very few people care who he pardoned, or why the pardons go back to 2014.

Similarly, many don't care which news agencies censored or supressed stories on behalf of the Biden campaign. Too busy trying to insist that 'orange-man-bad' I guess...

[Sean Hayden]

In the article itself it says it just takes the Supreme Court, the same court that has already ruled in Trump’s favor multiple times.

Anyway, who’s going to stop him having you arrested while the courts work it out?

“He can’t!” “He just can’t!”