So vanished children have been raptured?!?Rum wrote:This from http://www.raptureready.com/lbl/leftb70.html
"You are probably searching for an explanation for the disappearance of millions of people all over the world. Do not believe the lie that aliens from another planet abducted them or other outrageous explanations. God’s Word has the only explanation for the “vanishings” and that is the Rapture of the Church of Jesus Christ. You may be thinking, “not that Jesus guy again!” I challenge you to do your own research on those who have vanished. You will find the common denominator of those taken will be born again believers2 in Jesus Christ, and children not mature enough to believe in Jesus as their Lord, Savior and God. Parents and grandparents I know you are suffering with the vanishing of your children, but have faith that they are with the Lord in heaven".
![]()
![]()
'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists
- Pappa
- Non-Practicing Anarchist

- Posts: 56488
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
- About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
- Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
- Contact:
Re: 'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.
When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.
-
devogue
Re: 'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists
Lord Lucan.Rum wrote:This from http://www.raptureready.com/lbl/leftb70.htmlYou will find the common denominator of those taken will be born again believers2 in Jesus Christ
Fail.
- Deep Sea Isopod
- Bathynomus giganteus
- Posts: 7806
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:09 am
- Location: Gods blind spot.
- Contact:
Re: 'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists
Has anyone mentioned that this new artificial life has a designer? 
I run with scissors. It makes me feel dangerous 



Re: 'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists
You have been banned for the following reason:
No reason was specified.
Date the ban will be lifted: Never
didn't even get to post
No reason was specified.
Date the ban will be lifted: Never
didn't even get to post
Outside the ordered universe is that amorphous blight of nethermost confusion which blasphemes and bubbles at the center of all infinity—the boundless daemon sultan Azathoth, whose name no lips dare speak aloud, and who gnaws hungrily in inconceivable, unlighted chambers beyond time and space amidst the muffled, maddening beating of vile drums and the thin monotonous whine of accursed flutes.
Code: Select all
// Replaces with spaces the braces in cases where braces in places cause stasis
$str = str_replace(array("\{","\}")," ",$str);- Pappa
- Non-Practicing Anarchist

- Posts: 56488
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
- About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
- Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
- Contact:
Re: 'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists
What was your username?Ghatanothoa wrote:You have been banned for the following reason:
No reason was specified.
Date the ban will be lifted: Never
didn't even get to post
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.
When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.
- Deep Sea Isopod
- Bathynomus giganteus
- Posts: 7806
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:09 am
- Location: Gods blind spot.
- Contact:
Re: 'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists
Lemme guess who the critics are....... ?........but critics say there are dangers posed by synthetic organisms.
I run with scissors. It makes me feel dangerous 



- Pappa
- Non-Practicing Anarchist

- Posts: 56488
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
- About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
- Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
- Contact:
Re: 'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists
Funny thing is, due to the number of genes and available raw materials for mutation, GMO's are probably far more potentially dangerous than synthetic organisms... and what about flu?Deep Sea Isopod wrote:Lemme guess who the critics are....... ?........but critics say there are dangers posed by synthetic organisms.![]()
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.
When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.
Re: 'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists
I didn't say anything. Honestly.Deep Sea Isopod wrote:Lemme guess who the critics are....... ?........but critics say there are dangers posed by synthetic organisms.![]()
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
- GenesForLife
- Bertie Wooster
- Posts: 1392
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 6:44 pm
- Contact:
Re: 'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists
Since Cali isn't here yet, I'll do my bit...
The abstract of the paper detailing this reads as follows
The whole venture could be summarized as follows.
1) Identifying the minimal complement of genes required for the survival of the original Mycoplasma mycoides organism.
2) Synthesis of the minimal complement from scratch using chemical nucleosynthesis.
3) Stiching it up and incubating the genome as a plasmid in bacteria and then in yeast to obtain large numbers of copies.
4) Taking Mycoplasma capricolum and removing its DNA
5) Introducing the new genome into the empty "shell" left behind by the process.
6) The organism resulting thus has demonstrated the properties of a living cell and has a completely unique genomic composition, hence it is , to put properly, a synthetic lifeform.
The abstract of the paper detailing this reads as follows
The full paper can be found at http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/rapidpdf/ ... 0719v1.pdfWe report the design, synthesis, and assembly of the 1.08-Mbp Mycoplasma mycoides JCVI-syn1.0 genome starting from digitized genome sequence information and its transplantation into a Mycoplasma capricolum recipient cell to create new Mycoplasma mycoides cells that are controlled only by the synthetic chromosome. The only DNA in the cells is the designed synthetic DNA sequence, including "watermark" sequences and other designed gene deletions and polymorphisms, and mutations acquired during the building process. The new cells have expected phenotypic properties and are capable of continuous self-replication.
The whole venture could be summarized as follows.
1) Identifying the minimal complement of genes required for the survival of the original Mycoplasma mycoides organism.
2) Synthesis of the minimal complement from scratch using chemical nucleosynthesis.
3) Stiching it up and incubating the genome as a plasmid in bacteria and then in yeast to obtain large numbers of copies.
4) Taking Mycoplasma capricolum and removing its DNA
5) Introducing the new genome into the empty "shell" left behind by the process.
6) The organism resulting thus has demonstrated the properties of a living cell and has a completely unique genomic composition, hence it is , to put properly, a synthetic lifeform.
Re: 'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists
I thought it was slightly different.GenesForLife wrote: 4) Taking Mycoplasma capricolum and removing its DNA
-
devogue
Re: 'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists
You'd think they would lift the ban after the Rapture - what good is the forum to them then?Ghatanothoa wrote:You have been banned for the following reason:
No reason was specified.
Date the ban will be lifted: Never
didn't even get to post
- Deep Sea Isopod
- Bathynomus giganteus
- Posts: 7806
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:09 am
- Location: Gods blind spot.
- Contact:
Re: 'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists
Yeah, I was just about to say that.GenesForLife wrote:Since Cali isn't here yet, I'll do my bit...
The abstract of the paper detailing this reads as follows
The full paper can be found at http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/rapidpdf/ ... 0719v1.pdfWe report the design, synthesis, and assembly of the 1.08-Mbp Mycoplasma mycoides JCVI-syn1.0 genome starting from digitized genome sequence information and its transplantation into a Mycoplasma capricolum recipient cell to create new Mycoplasma mycoides cells that are controlled only by the synthetic chromosome. The only DNA in the cells is the designed synthetic DNA sequence, including "watermark" sequences and other designed gene deletions and polymorphisms, and mutations acquired during the building process. The new cells have expected phenotypic properties and are capable of continuous self-replication.
The whole venture could be summarized as follows.
1) Identifying the minimal complement of genes required for the survival of the original Mycoplasma mycoides organism.
2) Synthesis of the minimal complement from scratch using chemical nucleosynthesis.
3) Stiching it up and incubating the genome as a plasmid in bacteria and then in yeast to obtain large numbers of copies.
4) Taking Mycoplasma capricolum and removing its DNA
5) Introducing the new genome into the empty "shell" left behind by the process.
6) The organism resulting thus has demonstrated the properties of a living cell and has a completely unique genomic composition, hence it is , to put properly, a synthetic lifeform.
I run with scissors. It makes me feel dangerous 



- GenesForLife
- Bertie Wooster
- Posts: 1392
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 6:44 pm
- Contact:
Re: 'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists
Doesn't mean DNA removal was direct, they could have used a phage based nuclease to do the dirty work.natselrox wrote:I thought it was slightly different.GenesForLife wrote: 4) Taking Mycoplasma capricolum and removing its DNA
- GenesForLife
- Bertie Wooster
- Posts: 1392
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 6:44 pm
- Contact:
Re: 'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists
The abstract explicitly states that the synthesized genome was the only DNA present in the cell after transplantation, in other words, the innate DNA in the recipient would have had to be removed.
Re: 'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists
Doesn't that sound a bit odd? I was confused on reading that.GenesForLife wrote:The abstract explicitly states that the synthesized genome was the only DNA present in the cell after transplantation, in other words, the innate DNA in the recipient would have had to be removed.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests
