For Your Eyes Only - Sheena Easton

Post Reply
devogue

For Your Eyes Only - Sheena Easton

Post by devogue » Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:47 pm



I was unfortunate enough to hear this on the radio today and I was struck by how dreadful a singer Sheena Easton really is.

I mean, forget for a second that the song is complete pap and just focus on her performance. You can hear her straining to reach notes because her voice becomes nasal (like that donkey Kylie Minogue), and she completely loses the plot at this line:
The passions that collide in me
Her voice breaks and she is so obviously flat - I don't know why they didn't just transpose it lower, but the notes in that song shouldn't remotely stretch even a mediocre soprano. It's shocking that such a high profile song has been produced so badly and that no one seems to have pulled the talentless woman who sings it. :dono:

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32528
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: For Your Eyes Only - Sheena Easton

Post by charlou » Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:51 pm

She had potential but didn't reach it. Her voice is too tight.
no fences

User avatar
colubridae
Custom Rank: Rank
Posts: 2771
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:16 pm
About me: http://www.essentialart.com/acatalog/Ed ... Stars.html
Location: Birmingham art gallery
Contact:

Re: For Your Eyes Only - Sheena Easton

Post by colubridae » Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:54 pm

devogue wrote:

I was unfortunate enough to hear this on the radio today and I was struck by how dreadful a singer Sheena Easton really is.

I mean, forget for a second that the song is complete pap and just focus on her performance. You can hear her straining to reach notes because her voice becomes nasal (like that donkey Kylie Minogue), and she completely loses the plot at this line:
The passions that collide in me
Her voice breaks and she is so obviously flat - I don't know why they didn't just transpose it lower, but the notes in that song shouldn't remotely stretch even a mediocre soprano. It's shocking that such a high profile song has been produced so badly and that no one seems to have pulled the talentless woman who sings it. :dono:

so that's null points, then. :funny:
I have a well balanced personality. I've got chips on both shoulders

devogue

Re: For Your Eyes Only - Sheena Easton

Post by devogue » Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:56 pm

Charlou wrote:She had potential but didn't reach it. Her voice is too tight.
Her vibrato ("shaking" voice) is pretty good and she is competent in the lower range, but that's about it. She must have been shagging someone.

btw - Diana Ross's voice is piss poor as well - she is by far the weakest of The Supremes.

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: For Your Eyes Only - Sheena Easton

Post by Bella Fortuna » Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:05 pm

You should start a thread on famous/successful singers who are really shite. :eddy:
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

User avatar
BlackBart
Posts: 337
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:49 am
About me: The latest in Skynet's 'Cantankerous Sod' series.
Location: An obscure corner of a spiral arm galax... Oh Sod it.... Bromley
Contact:

Re: For Your Eyes Only - Sheena Easton

Post by BlackBart » Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:09 pm

Poor girl can't hold a high note at all. She has to sing 'only for yure'
It's funny until someone gets hurt. Then it's just hilarious.

User avatar
BlackBart
Posts: 337
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:49 am
About me: The latest in Skynet's 'Cantankerous Sod' series.
Location: An obscure corner of a spiral arm galax... Oh Sod it.... Bromley
Contact:

Re: For Your Eyes Only - Sheena Easton

Post by BlackBart » Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:15 pm

Still, couldn't be much worse than this...

It's funny until someone gets hurt. Then it's just hilarious.

devogue

Re: For Your Eyes Only - Sheena Easton

Post by devogue » Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:33 pm

BlackBart wrote:Still, couldn't be much worse than this...

Oh God the horror. I can't even play that again, knowing how terrible it is.

devogue

Re: For Your Eyes Only - Sheena Easton

Post by devogue » Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:34 pm

BlackBart wrote:Poor girl can't hold a high note at all. She has to sing 'only for yure'
Exactly. :tup:

User avatar
BlackBart
Posts: 337
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:49 am
About me: The latest in Skynet's 'Cantankerous Sod' series.
Location: An obscure corner of a spiral arm galax... Oh Sod it.... Bromley
Contact:

Re: For Your Eyes Only - Sheena Easton

Post by BlackBart » Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:59 pm

devogue wrote:
BlackBart wrote:Still, couldn't be much worse than this...

Oh God the horror. I can't even play that again, knowing how terrible it is.
BlackBart - Bringing bleak horror into people's lives since 1962!
It's funny until someone gets hurt. Then it's just hilarious.

User avatar
Posse Comitatus
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 3:45 pm
Contact:

Re: For Your Eyes Only - Sheena Easton

Post by Posse Comitatus » Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:47 pm

Duran Duran are still at times a bit amazing though. The Reflex anyone?

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: For Your Eyes Only - Sheena Easton

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Fri Jun 25, 2010 4:28 pm

Posse Comitatus wrote:Duran Duran are still at times a bit amazing though. The Reflex anyone?
You cannot possibly be such an 80s whore! I call poe! Are you Mandy? :hehe:
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
Posse Comitatus
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 3:45 pm
Contact:

Re: For Your Eyes Only - Sheena Easton

Post by Posse Comitatus » Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:57 pm

Xamonas Chegwé wrote:
Posse Comitatus wrote:Duran Duran are still at times a bit amazing though. The Reflex anyone?
You cannot possibly be such an 80s whore! I call poe! Are you Mandy? :hehe:
Probably not Mandy in the sense of whoever it is you're referring to.


If you're referring to Mandy as in Peter Mandelson (you probably aren't) I have been told I look like him quite often but I don't much see the resemblance. In fact recently a photo of me was uploaded to Facebook at a party with a clumsily tied bowtie and a collar all haphazard and sticking over my jacket with the caption 'Who invited Peter Mandelson?' in block capitals even though lovely Peter would never be seen dead in such a state of sartorial disarray.

I wish I was Mandelson though because he is a beautiful, beautiful human being.

User avatar
drl2
Posts: 1527
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 3:49 pm
Contact:

Re: For Your Eyes Only - Sheena Easton

Post by drl2 » Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:20 pm

There are worse Sheena Easton songs you could have chosen...

Who needs a signature anyway?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests