devogue wrote:I hate it when moonlight wakes me up.
Moonlight Sonata my arse.
Is the moon necessary for life?
- GenesForLife
- Bertie Wooster
- Posts: 1392
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 6:44 pm
- Contact:
Re: Is the moon necessary for life?
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Is the moon necessary for life?
It was an asteroid the size of Mars, or so I've heard.amused wrote:The moon was originally a part of earth and was knocked away by a big asteroid. The earth would have been biggerer if that hadn't happened. So we'd all have biggerer muscle bits to compensate for the higher gravity of a biggerer earth.
So it's the asteroids fault if you have smallerer muscles.
-
Coito ergo sum
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Is the moon necessary for life?
If it wasn't for the moon, humans most likely would not be here. The moon stabilizes the Earth somewhat, and without it there would have been violent and repeated changes in climate.Dory wrote:Biologically speaking-- it seems like a useless piece of junk, really. I mean, life doesn't actually need a moonlight, right?
Disclaimer: I don't mean to underestimate its poetical beauty, but from practical PoV...
If the moon had never been there, our day would be about 8 hours long (the moon has helped slow down the Earth). Tides would have been much lower, since the only tidal forces would have been from the sun. A faster rotation means faster winds (figure common winds at 100 miles per hour - hurricane-like), and storm winds would be much faster and much more common.
Since the moon was formed much closer to the Earth - about 10-15 times closer than it is now - and has since been moving away - we know that when the moon first formed the tides were tremendous - like 1,000 times higher than they are now - and very frequent. This constant churning caused the oceans to fill up with compounds necessary for life much faster than would occur in a moonless Earth.
It's seems reasonable to conclude that it would have taken a lot longer for life to begin on Earth because of not having a moon. If life formed, then evolution would have been quite different, with a much shorter day and only 3-4 hours of sunlight per day and the massively high winds. It may be more difficult for complex life to form, and if it did it would likely have radically different biology.
-
devogue
Re: Is the moon necessary for life?
The Moon is definitely necessary for life, for a number of very good reasons:
1) It lights up dark country roads at night so that when drunk people walk home from the pub they don't fall down ditches and die. Drunk people have more sex than sober people and they don't bother with contraception. Bada bing, as they say at Caltech.
2) The Moon enables werewolves to do their shit, culling the really stupid bastards that don't "keep to the path" and ensuring that the gene pool stays strong and healthy.
3) At night time "Moon Rain" falls from the Moon - it's made of Cambazola and it lands all over the countryside. It gets eaten by loony-chompers, the lowest form of molecular life - they in turn shit out lumps of "fotosinthesis" which are nom-nommed by hungry grass, and so on up the food chain.
4) The moon's spinning around the Earth is like a giant ball going round and round. This huge ball distracts our huge cats, the lions, and it stops them from taking over and eating us all.

1) It lights up dark country roads at night so that when drunk people walk home from the pub they don't fall down ditches and die. Drunk people have more sex than sober people and they don't bother with contraception. Bada bing, as they say at Caltech.
2) The Moon enables werewolves to do their shit, culling the really stupid bastards that don't "keep to the path" and ensuring that the gene pool stays strong and healthy.
3) At night time "Moon Rain" falls from the Moon - it's made of Cambazola and it lands all over the countryside. It gets eaten by loony-chompers, the lowest form of molecular life - they in turn shit out lumps of "fotosinthesis" which are nom-nommed by hungry grass, and so on up the food chain.
4) The moon's spinning around the Earth is like a giant ball going round and round. This huge ball distracts our huge cats, the lions, and it stops them from taking over and eating us all.
- Elessarina
- Bearer of Anduril

- Posts: 9517
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 5:12 pm
- About me: The Fastest Ratz.. apparently
- Location: Rivendell
- Contact:
Re: Is the moon necessary for life?
Svartalf wrote:Bravo Elessarina
I wanted to do the same, but the pancakebunnyreflex failed me.

- RuleBritannia
- Cupid is a cunt!
- Posts: 1630
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:55 pm
- About me: About you
- Location: The Machine
- Contact:
Re: Is the moon necessary for life?
Wait. The asteroid was bigger than the Moon? That means the impact increased the size of the Earth.SPMaximus wrote:And heres a nifty lil' animation showing itamused wrote:The moon was originally a part of earth and was knocked away by a big asteroid
But its only a hypothesis
RuleBritannia © MMXI
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Is the moon necessary for life?
No, the original Earth was smaller than the present version.RuleBritannia wrote:Wait. The asteroid was bigger than the Moon? That means the impact increased the size of the Earth.
- rachelbean
- "awesome."
- Posts: 15757
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:08 am
- About me: I'm a nerd.
- Location: Wales, aka not England
- Contact:
Re: Is the moon necessary for life?
devogue wrote:The Moon is definitely necessary for life, for a number of very good reasons:
1) It lights up dark country roads at night so that when drunk people walk home from the pub they don't fall down ditches and die. Drunk people have more sex than sober people and they don't bother with contraception. Bada bing, as they say at Caltech.
2) The Moon enables werewolves to do their shit, culling the really stupid bastards that don't "keep to the path" and ensuring that the gene pool stays strong and healthy.
3) At night time "Moon Rain" falls from the Moon - it's made of Cambazola and it lands all over the countryside. It gets eaten by loony-chompers, the lowest form of molecular life - they in turn shit out lumps of "fotosinthesis" which are nom-nommed by hungry grass, and so on up the food chain.
4) The moon's spinning around the Earth is like a giant ball going round and round. This huge ball distracts our huge cats, the lions, and it stops them from taking over and eating us all.
![]()
![]()
lordpasternack wrote:Yeah - I fuckin' love oppressin' ma wimmin, like I love chowin' on ma bacon and tuggin' on ma ol' cock…
Pappa wrote:God is a cunt! I wank over pictures of Jesus! I love Darwin so much I'd have sex with his bones!!!!

-
devogue
Re: Is the moon necessary for life?
I like the way it "takes a run at it".RuleBritannia wrote:Wait. The asteroid was bigger than the Moon? That means the impact increased the size of the Earth.SPMaximus wrote:And heres a nifty lil' animation showing itamused wrote:The moon was originally a part of earth and was knocked away by a big asteroid
But its only a hypothesis
- RuleBritannia
- Cupid is a cunt!
- Posts: 1630
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:55 pm
- About me: About you
- Location: The Machine
- Contact:
Re: Is the moon necessary for life?
How's that different from what I said?Gawdzilla wrote:No, the original Earth was smaller than the present version.RuleBritannia wrote:Wait. The asteroid was bigger than the Moon? That means the impact increased the size of the Earth.
RuleBritannia © MMXI
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Is the moon necessary for life?
Just clarifying that A + B = C + D where A is the pre-impact Earth and B is the collider, and C is the post-impact Earth and D is the Moon.RuleBritannia wrote:How's that different from what I said?Gawdzilla wrote:No, the original Earth was smaller than the present version.RuleBritannia wrote:Wait. The asteroid was bigger than the Moon? That means the impact increased the size of the Earth.
Re: Is the moon necessary for life?
Bollocks 

“I wish no harm to any human being, but I, as one man, am going to exercise my freedom of speech. No human being on the face of the earth, no government is going to take from me my right to speak, my right to protest against wrong, my right to do everything that is for the benefit of mankind. I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.”
John Maclean (Scottish socialist) speech from the Dock 1918.
John Maclean (Scottish socialist) speech from the Dock 1918.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Is the moon necessary for life?
It must have been quite a sight, hey Pen? *jealous*Pensioner wrote:Bollocks
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests