Richard Dawkins Forum

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Post Reply
User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32528
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Richard Dawkins Forum

Post by charlou » Wed Jun 22, 2011 1:15 pm

Cormac wrote:*Some are really old.
Dating back to pre schism numero uno, even.
no fences

User avatar
lordpasternack
Divine Knob Twiddler
Posts: 6459
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
About me: I have remarkable elbows.
Contact:

Re: Richard Dawkins Forum

Post by lordpasternack » Wed Jun 22, 2011 1:22 pm

As for traffic - yep, it's down. It spent the whole of 2010 slipping slowly, and only had a small 3-month period of growth from around Feb-May this year, since which it has been sputtering… Traffic ain't what it used to be and ain't anywhere near what it would have been if the site was simply left as it was. Even if traffic had simply stagnated since the implimentation of the new site, it would have been enough to raise suspicions that something wrong had been done…
Then they for sudden joy did weep,
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41035
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Richard Dawkins Forum

Post by Svartalf » Wed Jun 22, 2011 1:34 pm

what's to expect? the reason the place had so much traffic up to 2009, posters, and those following the posts, disappeared overnight. Maybe the new formula has generated a bit of publicity, but not that many people will be regular comers like there used to be.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32528
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Richard Dawkins Forum

Post by charlou » Wed Jun 22, 2011 1:39 pm

lordpasternack wrote:As for traffic - yep, it's down. It spent the whole of 2010 slipping slowly, and only had a small 3-month period of growth from around Feb-May this year, since which it has been sputtering… Traffic ain't what it used to be and ain't anywhere near what it would have been if the site was simply left as it was. Even if traffic had simply stagnated since the implimentation of the new site, it would have been enough to raise suspicions that something wrong had been done…
Meanwhile rdf mkII, aka ratskep, is going strong ...
no fences

User avatar
lordpasternack
Divine Knob Twiddler
Posts: 6459
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
About me: I have remarkable elbows.
Contact:

Re: Richard Dawkins Forum

Post by lordpasternack » Wed Jun 22, 2011 1:44 pm

Well, yeah, Svartalf - but they also still have people joining all the time, and not all ex forum-goers forsook the new Discussion area. The loss of a number of particular posters doesn't account for the sustained loss of traffic, not on it's own. :tea:
Then they for sudden joy did weep,
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.

User avatar
lordpasternack
Divine Knob Twiddler
Posts: 6459
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
About me: I have remarkable elbows.
Contact:

Re: Richard Dawkins Forum

Post by lordpasternack » Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:20 pm

klr wrote: You didn't "encounter" lordpasternack at any point, did you? :hehe:
What's with the inverted commas? :hehe:
Then they for sudden joy did weep,
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.

Pensioner
Grumpy old fart.
Posts: 3066
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 7:22 am
Contact:

Re: Richard Dawkins Forum

Post by Pensioner » Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:37 pm

Cormac wrote:
charlou wrote:
klr wrote:I really believe that he just didn't have any idea what he was letting himself in for.
I agree.


Good to see you again, Cormac. :cheers:
It is nice to be back amongst old* pals. :)


*Some are really old.
Was you thinking about me when you posted that you paddy cunt. :swoon:

PS I was given the order of the boot from that forum, never understood why?
“I wish no harm to any human being, but I, as one man, am going to exercise my freedom of speech. No human being on the face of the earth, no government is going to take from me my right to speak, my right to protest against wrong, my right to do everything that is for the benefit of mankind. I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.”

John Maclean (Scottish socialist) speech from the Dock 1918.

devogue

Re: Richard Dawkins Forum

Post by devogue » Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:02 pm

Pensioner wrote:
Cormac wrote:
charlou wrote:
klr wrote:I really believe that he just didn't have any idea what he was letting himself in for.
I agree.


Good to see you again, Cormac. :cheers:
It is nice to be back amongst old* pals. :)


*Some are really old.
Was you thinking about me when you posted that you paddy cunt. :swoon:

PS I was given the order of the boot from that forum, never understood why?
Senility.

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32528
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Richard Dawkins Forum

Post by charlou » Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:45 pm

devogue wrote:
Pensioner wrote:
Cormac wrote:
charlou wrote:
klr wrote:I really believe that he just didn't have any idea what he was letting himself in for.
I agree.


Good to see you again, Cormac. :cheers:
It is nice to be back amongst old* pals. :)


*Some are really old.
Was you thinking about me when you posted that you paddy cunt. :swoon:

PS I was given the order of the boot from that forum, never understood why?
Virility.
Pen :grr:
no fences

User avatar
Cormac
Posts: 6415
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Richard Dawkins Forum

Post by Cormac » Thu Jun 23, 2011 1:04 pm

Pensioner wrote:
Cormac wrote:
charlou wrote:
klr wrote:I really believe that he just didn't have any idea what he was letting himself in for.
I agree.


Good to see you again, Cormac. :cheers:
It is nice to be back amongst old* pals. :)


*Some are really old.
Was you thinking about me when you posted that you paddy cunt. :swoon:

PS I was given the order of the boot from that forum, never understood why?

Who else?

:)

No doubt I'd have eventually got the boot too. I'm not exactly retiring in the face of bullies. I tend to be a bit like a dog with a bone.

I spent the last year and a half in your lovely country. Nice beer.
FUCKERPUNKERSHIT!


Wanna buy some pegs Dave, I've got some pegs here...
You're my wife now!

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Richard Dawkins Forum

Post by Robert_S » Thu Jun 23, 2011 1:14 pm

lordpasternack wrote:As for traffic - yep, it's down. It spent the whole of 2010 slipping slowly, and only had a small 3-month period of growth from around Feb-May this year, since which it has been sputtering… Traffic ain't what it used to be and ain't anywhere near what it would have been if the site was simply left as it was. Even if traffic had simply stagnated since the implimentation of the new site, it would have been enough to raise suspicions that something wrong had been done…
I'm sad to hear that, especially for those people living in heavily religious areas that may have read one of Richard's books or saw a Youtube clip and would come around and vent what they've been keeping bottled up, get a little validation and breath easier if just for an hour here and there when they can be alone on the net. I suppose that they could look a bit further and find one the forums on their own, but sometimes having a friendly and understanding "voice" just a minute sooner can make a world of difference.

:sigh:
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests